The study, which tested two provocative selling messages against a message that reinforced the known causes of status quo bias, found that participants in the provocative conditions were 10 percent more likely to switch providers or shop around than participants in the status quo reinforcement message.
“At a time when challenging the customer is all the rage, this research stands as a strong rebuttal to the idea that provocative messaging is universally applicable,” said Tim Riesterer, chief strategy officer of Corporate Visions. “As this study shows, marketing messaging that challenges the status quo can actually backfire in a renewal selling scenario, putting you at a significant disadvantage when you’re trying to protect your status as the incumbent.”
The study also found that participants who experienced the status quo reinforcement message, which documented success, reported a:
- 13 percent boost in intentions to renew, relative to the two provocative messages.
- 9 percent boost in positive attitudes, compared to the two provocative messages.
- 7 percent lift in credibility perceptions, relative to the provocative conditions.
“There’s a time and a place for a disruptive message that injects urgency into the conversation, and it’s when you’re the outsider looking to defeat the status quo or introduce a new concept, not when you’re the insider trying to maintain a service or subscription,” Riesterer said. “So many customer conversations revolve around the question of ‘Why Stay,’ and to answer that question effectively, marketers and salespeople need to be great at reinforcing the causes of the status quo bias in their messaging, content and skills.”
For more information, please check out the research brief.